Juris Novus companion blog

Wednesday, May 18, 2005

When White Collar Crime Trials Turn Into Cures for Insomnia

White Collar Crime Prof Blog: When White Collar Crime Trials Turn Into Cures for Insomnia

White collar cases are rarely simple affairs, and usually involve a number of documents and a stream of transactions that need to be placed in a larger context. Yet, prosecutors sometimes become enamored with the details of a case, especially when they know the evidence so well that everything seems important, and interesting.

Blogs Better Than Papers/Books?

The Volokh Conspiracy - Which Are Better -- Blogs or the Traditional Media?

Prof. Volokh elucidates, enlightens and makes all sorts of sense:

The question, it seems to me, should be how blogs and newspapers -- or, better yet, particular kinds of blogs and newspapers -- can become more accurate, useful, and readable. A part of the answer, in fact, would be more criticism, criticism that has increased with the development of blogs. But in any event, such an inquiry is much more helpful than attempts to compare things that can't be compared or aren't worth comparing.

Friday, May 13, 2005

Uzbek Soldiers Kill Dozens of Protesters

Uzbek Soldiers Kill Dozens of Protesters - Yahoo! News

Ugly. Always ugly.

The government said 12 died, but witnesses said dozens may have been killed by the troops, who rode into the square in a truck behind an armored personnel carrier as helicopters hovered overhead.

Free Love

AntitrustProf Blog: Free Love

Interesting story about some dusty old law that hasn't been dealt with yet.

Beer Label a Hate Crime (?)

Overlawyered: Claim: beer label a hate crime

The Lost Coast Brewery in Humboldt, Calif. says it will take off the shelves its Indica India Pale Ale, whose label currently depicts the Indian elephant-god Ganesh "holding a beer in one of his four hands, and another in his trunk".

Thursday, May 12, 2005

FBI Nabs Troops, Officers in Drug Sting

FBI Nabs Troops, Officers in Drug Sting - Yahoo! News

Oops. Boys watching the inmates get caught red handed.

Wednesday, May 11, 2005

Porn-Surfing on the Job Not a Firing Offense?

Enron Stuff

White Collar Crime Prof Blog: Enron Stuff

Peter Henning on recent developments in the courts related to Enron and Merrill Lynch.

Speaking of Enron, saw Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room this past weekend. Excellent move; its the sort of documentary Michael Moore wants to make, but can't because he lets his emotional streak run red.

"Anonymous Blogging" Not Always So

Inside Higher Ed :: 'The Phantom Professor'

"Anonymous Law Prof Blogger" gets outed at SMU. Hilarity ensues, firing ensues. The Internet has never been the place to be faceless and nameless.

Tuesday, May 10, 2005

Betsy's Charter School Ranks 9th in Newsweek's Ratings of Public High Schools.--

The Volokh Conspiracy - Betsy's Charter School Ranks 9th in Newsweek's Ratings of Public High Schools.--

Jim Lindgren is mentioning the new Newsweek highschool rankings for some reason. Will the insanity never end?

Monday, May 09, 2005

21 Month Sentence for Computer Hacker

White Collar Crime Prof Blog: 21 Month Sentence for Computer Hacker

Feds getting tough on computer criminals. Sounds good - apparently the guilty party here was part of a group that spread spyware around the 'net:

TK conspirators created a computer worm to spread across the Internet and install Trojan software, i.e. software that masqueraded as legitimate software, but allowed Steigerwalt and other co-conspirators to remotely control infected computers.

Sunday, May 08, 2005

Less Love for "Ugly" Children

HealthLawProf Blog: Less Love for "Ugly" Children

News flash:

pretty children ... represent the best genetic legacy, and therefore they get more care

Defense Department Analyst Charged

White Collar Crime Prof Blog: Defense Department Analyst Charged

DoD being tough on their own when they do something incredibly dumb like share 'Top Secret' info with uncredentialed individuals.

Friday, May 06, 2005

Open Source Drama

Lawrence Lessig - advice taken

Lessig writes about the recent high drama related to Creative Commons and a grassroots PR firm they tendered.

U.S. National Identity Cards All But Law

Slashdot | U.S. National Identity Cards All But Law

Yuck. Double yuck.

"Starting three years from now, if you live or work in the United States, you'll need a federally approved ID card to travel on an airplane, open a bank account, collect Social Security payments, or take advantage of nearly any government service. Practically speaking, your driver's license likely will have to be reissued to meet federal standards."

Harvard Professors vs. Kiddie Art Studio

Poll: 3 of 4 Iraqis want Islam to be primary source for Iraq law

JURIST - Paper Chase: Poll: 3 of 4 Iraqis want Islam to be primary source for Iraq law

A poll of 2700 Iraqis released Friday reports that three out of four citizens believe that Islam should be a primary source of Iraqi law and legislation, with only two percent of respondents believing that religion should have no role in government.

School District Trying to Spread False Information About Homosexuality

The Volokh Conspiracy - School District Trying to Spread False Information About

Prof. Volokh dismisses some ass-backwards teachings happening in the class room.

Kansas Challenges Definition of Science

FCC Broadcast Flag Struck Down

Slashdot | FCC Broadcast Flag Struck Down

Good news for those who want open access to broadcast technology.

Wednesday, May 04, 2005

Humor and Wit in Supreme Court Opinions:

Change of Heart (re: MGM v. Grokster)

The Volokh Conspiracy - Change of Heart (re: MGM v. Grokster)

David Post with some interesting insight into MGM v. Grokster (he authored an amicus brief for the Ps):

I think my initial prediction was wrong.
For some pretty gnarly procedural reasons, I don't think the Court will be able to reach the question of whether Grokster can be liable for "inducement" -- actively encouraging, through advertising or otherwise, others to infringe copyright.... That leaves just the question of whether distribution of its software, alone, can be considered "contributory" infringement.

Judge Throws Out England's Guilty Plea

Judge Throws Out England's Guilty Plea - Yahoo! News

Stunning.

A military judge Wednesday threw out Pfc. Lynndie England's guilty plea to abusing Iraqi detainees at Abu Ghraib prison, saying he was not convinced the Army reservist who appeared in some of the most notorious photos in the scandal knew her actions were wrong at the time.

Let the Cats Roam Free

Appellate Law & Practice: Let the cats roam free

I always thought that some of the more interesting / silly opinions are unpublished. Here is a gem of an opinion I found while doing legal research for one of my civil cases. It is cat-bite case, which generated three (!) separate opinions from a 3-justice panel.

Poker Night Gets Interesting

Overlawyered: Poker club night

Playing Hold'um with your friends may be a risky venture.

New Survey Tackles Complex Questions About Law Schools

law.com - New Survey Tackles Complex Questions About Law Schools

Students grade their law schools.

From the results:

On the positive side:
• 82 percent of students rated their schools "good" or "excellent."
• 82 percent were encouraged to learn by applying classroom theory to practical problems.
• 96 percent posed questions to spark classroom discussion.
• 94 percent found campus library services satisfactory or better.
• 76 percent were satisfied with their schools' emphasis on law practice ethics.

When Those Pesky Blogs Undermine NPR News

NPR : When Those Pesky Blogs Undermine NPR News

NPR goofs by posting a redacted version of a DoD document which still contains the redacted portions "hidden" away. Savvy bloggers pounce on the doc, post up the edited portions. NPR throws a fit and calls bloggers a whole bunch of names. Hilarity ensues.

Tuesday, May 03, 2005

15-Pound Burger Now on the Menu

Pa. Eatery Offers New 15-Pound Burger - Yahoo! News

This has absolutely nothing to do with the law but being a cheeseburger aficionado I had to link this one up.

Monday, May 02, 2005

Wikipedia Law Entry

Law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Be warned: once you embark on a Wikipedia adventure you may find yourself still reading a few hours later with more than a dozen tabs opened. See something that needs clarification? Pitch in; community edited encyclopedia!

The Register vs Groklaw: Who Gets It Right?

Slashdot | The Register vs Groklaw: Who Gets It Right?

Interesting follow-up to the aforementioned GROKLAW coverage. Seems that our friends on the other side of the pond don't agree with the way GROKLAW is doing things.

Spyware is Already Illegal, But Let's Pass A Law Banning It Anyway:

The Volokh Conspiracy - Spyware is Already Illegal, But Let's Pass A Law Banning It Anyway:

Orin Kerr rocks out:

Maybe the folks in Congress just don't understand current law; it's possible, given that the Justice Department has't pursued any spyware cases on the criminal front, the FTC apparently hasn't regulated spyware aggressively, and plaintiff's attorneys don't understand the Wiretap Act well enough to see the claim. Or maybe Congress just wants credit for solving a problem, and they won't let the fact that they already solved this problem a long time ago get in the way.

Jeb Bush Signs Harsh Child Sex Offender Bill

JURIST - Paper Chase: Jeb Bush signs bill setting harsher penalties for child sex offenders

The bill stated that all sex offenders who prey on children aged 12 or under will be sentenced to a mandatory 25 years in prison, and after release, the offenders will be tracked for life.

Pass the Butter; Leave the Knife

Overlawyered: "Butter knife 'an offensive weapon'"

Man gets convicted for carrying a "bladed weapon". Apparently the lack of sharp edges did not phase the judge who denied appeal.

Friday, April 29, 2005

SCO v. IBM Documents

GROKLAW: SCO v. IBM Documents

The Intellectual Property debacle that SCO v. IBM embodies, I will admit, is one of the primary reasons I became interested in the law. The case has stretched on for several years now and the ties between technology and law are fascinating to my technically trained mind. GROKLAW has provided tireless coverage of this case, amongst others related to software and IP.

Ambulance chasing in St. Cloud, MN

Overlawyered: Ambulance chasing in St. Cloud, MN

How may desperate/enterpising lawyers dredge up buisiness? Put an advertisement in the newspaper when you can't contact the plaintiff directly. As one blogger describes - "To say that this ad was in poor taste would be akin to describing wearing a halter top to a funeral as being a a bit underdressed".

Weird Politics Before the Rehnquist Retirement

The Volokh Conspiracy - The Weird Politics Before the Rehnquist Retirement:

Orin Kerr weighs in with an interesting theory on recent news threads being woven in the legal system:

"The big stories in the past few weeks have been filibusters in the Senate, Justice Sunday, the alleged Constitution-in-Exile movement, and Tom DeLay's criticism of Justice Kennedy. All of these stories have something in common, I think. They are mostly proxies for the political struggle to confirm the Bush Administration's choice to replace the ailing Chief Justice Rehnquist."

Huge Chavez:US Citizens Oppressed

CNN.com - Venezulean leader:U.S. citizens oppressed - Apr 29, 2005

As Chavez's and Castro's relationship blooms, hilarity ensues.

US Soldier Gets Death for Fratricide

Jury sentences soldier to death for ’03 attack

Sgt. Hasan Akbar sent to the injection chamber for killing two American troops and injuring another dozen. Other possible sentences included: life in prision with parole, or life in prison without parole. News flash: the US military remains proficient in the business of death.

Andersen Victory?

SCOTUSblog: A victory for Andersen?

Looks like AA may be faring well in atleast one aspect of the case brought forth by the US.

Wiretaps in US increase by 19 percent in 2004

Thursday, April 28, 2005

Never Too Late

House Resolution 564, Georgia State Legistlature

Georgia finally repealed the last vestiges of law related to segregation from their books.

Interesting tidbit burried in paragraph 6: "WHEREAS, the laws, hidden deep within the Code, were revealed in a recent study done by the University of Arizona;". A little bit of legwork reveals a study group at the U of A Law School which did the heavy lifting on the research end of this issue.

Joking About Killing the Pres

The Volokh Conspiracy - Jokes About Killing the President:

Prof. Volokh analyzes issues related to the First Amendment and some existing case law surrounding a radio commercial which hints at killing the President.

Back from Hiatus

I have been on a blogging haitus for some time now. Work has been sucking up a fair portion of my time, but I am going to attempt to pull interesting stories off of my law headline aggregator and post them up on here for further consumption.

I have accepted an offer of admission from a great school with an even greater scholarship package. Details available to those who can get ahold of my in private.

Regarding the "Coming" Military Draft

Leiter Reports: More Evidence Regarding the Coming Military Draft.

Leiter pulls a juicy excerpt from an article raising the hairy question of involuntary servitude.

May 1st, Law Day!

Law Day, Not Lawyers Day.

Interesting history of "Law Day", not to be confused with "take your lawyer out for lunch day".

Saturday, March 12, 2005

Points of Interest

The last few days have been an interesting few in the online law space. Two dramas are unfolding which have kept me entertained and interested for the duration:

#1 - Harvard Business School "Hackers"
Summary: Havard MBA hopefulls discover that there is a security hole in the admissions resource system. Havard MBA administrators get wise to what is going on and say "sayonara" to the 119 possible admits who attempted to game the system.

Responses: Volokh Conspiracy, divine angst, myself @ Law School Discussion, Google News.

#2 - AutoAdmit.com v. Leiter
Summary: Anthony Ciolli, administrator of AutoAdmit.com, releases law school ranking research paper. Later that day AutoAdmit.com, online law student forum, is mentioned in Volokh Conspiracy as being a racist and anti-Seminite hangout by an anonymous law professor. Brian Leiter, UTexas law prof and law school ranking guru, posts sensational headline "... Anthony Ciolli, Admits to Running Prelaw Discussion Board Awash in Racist, Anti-Semitic, Sexist Abuse". AutoAdmit.com/Ciolli fires back, implicating Leiter as the anonymous tipster to Volokh, further insinuating that a possible reason for Leiter's anonymous tip to Volokh was Ciolli's law school ranking paper which may have ruffled Leiter's feathers.

Responses: Classic Internet drama unfolding before our very eyes. Well played by all sides!

Monday, March 07, 2005

Law Tool Relased - Juris Novus

Juris Novus, a law headline aggregator, has been released! Pulling headlines from around the Internet, Juris Novus is a one stop shop for daily law headlines and news. Law professors, practicing lawyers and law student blogs are mixed and matched to create an information rich rally point.

I am proud to say that I put Juris Novus together. I look forward to continuing to develop the tool into a valuable asset. Please stop by and let me know what you think.

Thursday, February 17, 2005

Book Review: Brush With the Law by Robert Byrnes, Jaime Marquart

This is the second book review I have put together. The previous review was One L by Scott Turow. Feedback can be direct to pointdexterish@gmail.com and is appreciated.

Book Review: Brush With the Law by Robert Byrnes, Jaime Marquart

Shortly after posting the One L review, I received a suggestion for another book. A book, so the suggestor promised, which would act as a counterpoint to the somewhat brutal nature of Turow's law school experience. Brush with the Law was the suggestion. While it was an interesting departure from the often serious and harsh experience Turow purports - the book runs on similar parallels to One L nonetheless.

Sex, drugs, rock 'n roll: three things usually not on the short list of activities that come to mind when considering the grind of law school. Brush With the Law embraces these vices and dives head first into the rambunctious lives of Havard Law student Jaime Marquart and Stanford Law student Robert Byrnes. On a basic level Brush and One L are similar; both are written in a first person narrative/journal style. Jumping back and forth between Marquart's and Byrnes' stories, Brush paints a very detailed portrait of these two deliquents breaking the mold in law school.

Halloween orgies, gambling addictions, ditching class all semester, gaming the law school system and even a (admittedly fake) recipe for cocaine are poured over in vivid detail. Marquart and Byrnes lived fast in law school and do not seem to regret a single moment of it. Demysitfying the law school mystique is something that Jaime and Robert seem to revel in. The "fuck you too" attitude leaks out the pages.

While the book is chocked with overindulgence and debauchery - there are still some basic similarities to Turow's text: namely that law school is a time of immense emotional disparity and overwhelming change. The authors of Brush did not spend three years hoodwinking two of the best law schools in the world, they also underwent some of the same fundamental changes in personality and prejudice that Turow wrote on. Experiencing the crush of law school, even if only for the night before an exam (as was par for the course for Marquart and Byrnes) - they inherited the unique thinking patterns that law school demands. The impact of this change is not negligible.

Brush With the Law is a good read for prospective law students who may be unsure if they think law school is right for them. By the time the end of the book comes around it is apparent that law school need not be the center of the universe for the "last three years of freedom" it affords students. Observing the changes in both Jaime and Robert is an interesting experience itself.

Tuesday, February 01, 2005

Good Things on the Horizon

It has been a while since I have updated this, but there has been alot going on behind the scenes.

A few things to note:

  • Dinged at Notre Dame and University of Illinois. No surprise.
  • Accepted at Loyola-Chicago! No word on scholarship money yet, but it is nice to have my last application decided on. Now it is time for the decision making to begin in earnest.
  • Hired to clerk at a mid-sized Chicago litigation defense firm for the winter/spring/summer. It will be my first taste of firm life - can't wait to jump in and see what I am getting myself into.

On the decision making front Chicago-Kent has made a huge step forward. Yesterday I met with a professor for a day of talks, tours and information gathering. During lunch, in his office and while walking the halls of Kent I realized how closely aligned Kent's and my own interests are. The school is really on the bleeding edge of the intersection of technology and law. I have a decision to make in addition to the school I want to attend: do I run with technology related law or stick with a focus on more traditional law until I find out what really interests me.

Kent is solidly leading the pack at this point. Loyola's letter with a nice scholarship and a solid tour may change my mind.

Sunday, January 09, 2005

Book Review: One L by Scott Turow

This is the first book review I have put together. In the future I will be reviewing books that are related to the law and law school. As always feel free to send feedback to pointdexterish@gmail.com.

Book Review: One L by Scott Turow

Law school is an emotionally trying time. Most of the advice that I have heard from those who have survived the experience runs along the lines of "it was some of the most difficult work I have done, I'm happy to have the experience". Maybe it is the way that we interact with one another, but I had not heard anything about the emotional impact that the first year of law school has on its students.

Luckily Scott Turow's One L was recommended to me by a good, lawyerly type, friend. At 300 pages the book is a quick read taking two afternoons if you can spare the time. Turow kept a journal during his first year, known as 1L, at Harvard Law School. During his second year at Harvard he edited his journal into book form, published first in 1977.

The day to day details that Turow describes are unexceptional: heavy work loads, difficult professors and competitive class mates. Law school creates a pressure cooker and those who participate in this pressure cooker as students know what they are getting into. One detail that I had not thought much about, but in retrospect seems important, is the nature of interpersonal relationships during the turbulent first year. Turow made sure to devote a nice portion of the book to the difficulties that he and his wife Annette faced, and the ways that they managed their relationship under such a huge amount of stress. I will be recommending this book to those who will have close contact with me during my own 1L as a result.

Where One L really succeeds is detailing the emotional turmoil that a new law student goes through. Turow writes about the fact that law school requires its students to change their perceptions of justice and society in some very fundamental ways. These ideological changes, coupled with the stress induced by intense competition for top positions in the class, create an intense environment that can cause some harsh emotional reactions. The importance of distancing yourself from the rat race of hyper-competitive "gunners", or students who have a "whatever it takes" attitude, is highlighted by Turow. Stories of 20 hour study days and emotional out bursts in the hallways between classes illustrate just how bad things can get.

This book is a great read for prospective law students, friends and family of law students and anyone else who is interested in seeing law school through the eyes of a gifted writer.

Friday, January 07, 2005

Law School Research

Law School Research - Help!
Finding the right law school is a daunting task. This guide is meant to act as a starting point for a soon-to-be law school student who is looking for a place to begin their research. If you follow this guide you will have a handy list of law schools that will be getting applications from you. There are 187 American Bar Association (ABA) accredited law schools. Each of the 187 schools offers a unique experience. With the right tools you can find a school that fits your interests and your career aspirations.

A short list of things you should have ready at this point:
  • Desire to attend law school
  • Idea of your Law School Admission Test (LSAT) score
  • Your undergraduate GPA (uGPA)
  • Location preferences
Another list of things that are good to have in mind, but not necessary:
  • Areas of law you want to practice
  • What you want to do with your degree
Setting Up Your School List
So you want to go to law school, you have taken a few practice LSATs and you know what parts of the U.S. you wouldn't mind living in for the next three years. Now its time to start unraveling the often complicated law school selection process. Ideally after you have gone through this guide you will have a list of schools that includes a number of "saftey", "target" and "reach" schools.

Saftey School is a law school, statistically speaking you are garunteed admittance.
Target School is a law school, statistically speaking you are likely to be admitted.
Reach School is a law school, statistically speaking you are a unlikely to be admitted.

The suggested number of schools for each category varies from applicant to applicant, but a general rule of thumb is that you should apply to:
  • 3 Saftey Schools
  • 6 Target Schools
  • 3 Reach Schools
Depending on your situation you can move applications between the three categories. Twelve may seem like a large number of schools to apply to, but there are several reasons that a dozen applications make sense. You want to be sure you get into a law school. You want to have choices in where you attend. When you start getting offers of scholarship you want to be able to "play off" the money offered by each school to, hopefully, increase the total amount.

Playing the Numbers Game
Finding schools to fit into each category is one of the most difficult aspects of law school research. Lucky for you there are many tools online geared towards helping you take 187 schools and pare them down to a managable dozen.
One thing to remember throughout this process is that law school applications are driven very strongly by numbers. There are exceptions to every rule but statistical analysis is one of the most useful tools we have to figure out where you should apply.
Your uGPA and LSAT scores are the two most significant factors in the admissions process, whether or not admission committess (adcomms) at law schools own up to this is another discussion! Your uGPA is calculated by the Law School Admission Council (LSAC). Transcripts from every undergraduate institution you have attended are sent into LSAC and put through a formula to get your LSAC GPA.

Armed with these numbers you can start the research in earnest and begin to build your list of schools. The best place to begin, and the most valuable "official" resource at your disposal is the Official Guide to ABA-Approved Law Schools. This tool allows you to interact with a database of officially reported information reported directly by law schools to LSAC. Unlike a few other tools we will discuss, the Official Guide has information who's credibility is not questioned. The Official Guide offers seven different tools to explore the 187 ABA approved law schools.

Populating Your List
The LSAC Data Search is the best starting point. This tool will help you set up a base list of schools from which you can distill the places you will eventually be applying. Enter your uGPA and your LSAT, if you have not taken the LSAT then enter the average of your practice tests. After entering you data you will see that the [# of schools] column updates itself automatically. At this point you can start populating your list! Click the check box next to "[between 60-80% of the applicants with this combination]" and then click on "[List all law schools]". These schools should be the starting point of your Target Schools list.
Why use the 60-80% range and not the "riskier" 40-60% range? Because the data in this database is from 2003. Admission standards at schools have been moving in only one direction for many years - upwards! In order to adjust for the more competitive 2004 and 2005 admission standards I would suggest sticking with the more conservative 60-80% range.
There may be many schools in this list, there may only be a few. Whatever the case is copy down all the names of the schoosl. Make sure to mark the heading of the list as Target Schools.

Repeat the same process that you did for your Target Schools list, but follow these numbers instead for your Saftey Schools and Reach Schools list:
  • Saftey Schools would be the schools to which [greater than 90% of the applicants with this combination].
  • Target Schools would be the schools to which [between 40-60% of the applicants with this combination], feel free to sprinkle your Target Schools list with a few 20-40% schools as well.
At this point you should have a long list of schools, maybe more than a 100! 100 schools is almost half of the 187 which we started with. We are getting closer to the goal of a dozen schools. The next step in transforming this "long list" of schools into a shorter list is to filter the schools out by location. Location is a tricky thing for some and very easy for others. If you have a general idea of where you want to study in law school, great! Even broad ideas such as "west coast" or "south east" help. In the best case you will know the city that you want to study in, or near.

Filtering the List
The Official Guide to ABA-Approved Law Schools has another tool to help shorten our long list nice and quick, the Geographic Search. This step may take some time but go through your list and start deleting schools off one at a time. That previously long list should be looking a good bit slimmer at this point! You should also consider keeping a few schools on your list that do not fit your uGPA/LSAT and location preferences. These schools will help fill out your schools list and you don't want to wonder "What If" come acceptance letter time!

There are a few more tools you can consult to help massage your list into a more streamlined collection of schools. The Official Guide has reports for each law school in PDF format. Click on the "All Law Schools" link and click on a school name to see the school's profile page. Here you can find links to the law school's website, adcomm email and the "ABA Law School Data" and "Law School Description" PDF links. Both of these files will help you get an idea of how the law school in question works. The more you read the more you realize that there are small, but important differences between the schools.

Are you interested in smaller class section sizes? Do you have an interest in a particular area of law that some schools support with clinics, special sections and externship opportunities? How much scholarship does the school grant to incoming students? The list of questions extends on and on, and these PDF files offer answers to these questions. After perusing the Law School Data and Law School Description files it would be worthwhile to visit each school's website to see what additional information you can gather from it.

Other Filtering Suggestions
The advice for researching schools at this point becomes less important. Why? Because as you start to dive deeper into the details of law school admissions you will start to determine which things are important to you. What is valuable at this point are some additional tools.
Disclaimer: All of the tools mentioned up to this point have been linked to data supplied directly by law schools to LSAC. The tools mentioned here, while extremely useful, do not have the same link to data that can be held to the same level of authority. These tools are community run and are ran on the donation of information by those in the public.
The list of tools that come under this category include:
  • LawSchoolNumbers.com (LSN) This website is an interactive database of law school applicants who provide their admissions information to the site. It is possible to look at more recent data than the LSAC has collected - 2003/2004 and 2004/2005 admissions information are both on the site. Searching on schools for past admissions information will let you see how applicants did with various uGPA/LSAT combinations. Extremely useful tool. Take time to explore the interfaces for searching and graphing, becoming adept at them will help you understand the admissions process from a numbers oriented point of view.
  • LawSchoolDiscussion.com (LSD) Unlike the previous research tools mentioned LSD is an active online law school community. Questions about the application process are treated very respectfully and users of the discussion forum are very helpful in demystifying the research and application process. If you have doubts or uncertainties during your research and application process LSD provides a place to seek advice from a helpful community. Everyone is in the same boat on LSD and the topics discussed are a great asset for anyone looking to go to law school.
  • Chiashu, the disclaimer above does not apply to this tool, is a GPA/LSAT calculator. Chiashu, or Chaisu as it is often misspelled, offers a precise percentage of admittance where as the LSAC calculator gives ranges. Chiashu is based on the same formula as the LSAC calculator.
What Now?
You have come a long way towards getting your list of law schools down to that essential dozen. The best advice at this point is to read. Consume as much information as you can about law school and law schools. This blog will feature book reviews pertaining to law school in the near future. Be hungry! Visit those school websites until you know them front to back. Go on the tours, attend the open houses. Send emails to professors you think are doing interesting research. Immerse yourself in the research and application process and you will be satisfied with your choices.

Seek out alumni for specific questions you have about details you can't cull from readily available sources. Start up discussion threads on LSD when you are stumped with some information you just found, or if you are looking for advice about a school you know little about. This guide exists as a simple introduction to the world of law school research online. I have kept the application process seperate from the research process because I believe they are two different beasts. Being well prepared is the best way to jump into any large investment - and law school is certainly a large investment. Best of luck!


About the Author
I am a soon-to-be law student who will be matriculating to a school in Chicago. Which one? Give me a few more months and I'll have an answer for you! This guide was born out of the realization that there are no quality plain English guides to researching law schools out there. I have looked and looked and not found any guides I would call satisfying. Having recently finished this whole crazy process I believe that finding the right law school for your interests isn't difficult; it just takes time and hard work like anything else.

I warmly welcome and greatly appreciate feedback. I can be contacted at pointdexterish@gmail.com via email. I also post on LSD as "
pointdexterish". This guide will be tweaked and updated as I feel necessary or as I receive feedback.

Monday, December 27, 2004

Comparison of Three Law Schools in Chicago: Chicago-Kent, DePaul, Loyola

Link to the report is at the bottom of this post.

I have put together a rough draft of the report I am creating to aid in the decision making process. The report compares the Chicago-Kent, DePaul and Loyola law schools. As it stands the report is split into two sections: Subjective and Objective.

The subjective section currently is populated with facts about each school's Intellectual Property and International Law/Study Abroad programs. The objective section contains a by-the-numbers comparison of each school in the areas of "Basic Information", "Class Information" and "Employment Information".

This report is not fully mature yet but I have published a draft of it now and will continue to work on it over the coming weeks. As I visit each school the subjective comparison will grow in size and I plan on finding some more meaningful numbers to help make the objective comparison more complete.

The report can be found here:

Comparison of Three Law Schools in Chicago: Chicago-Kent, DePaul, Loyola

I will be updating this document and publishing changes via this journal. Any comments or feedback are welcome and can be directed to: pointdexterish@gmail.com

Saturday, December 25, 2004

A Happy Christmas Note

I promised myself that I would not be thinking about law school today or doing anything related to it.. but I have decided to break my promise and update the journal.

I heard back from another school with good news - in at John Marshall with $14,000 a year! Marshall is not a likely candidate at this point due to its reputation and ranking. It is still great to see that I am an attractive prospective student. Each one of these acceptances with scholarship money is a bargaining chip which I can use to help trump up the other offers.

The letter came from Marshall on Christmas Eve - a very nice way to start the holiday season! DePaul Law also sent a t-shirt the other day. I hope these schools start sending apparel and gifts in an attempt to win my favor.. I wouldn't mind adding some new clothes to my wardrobe.

I have also gotten quite a few items from my book list for Christmas. Books I have received include: One L, Planet Law School II, To Kill a Mocking Bird and a good bit of Amazon.com gift card money. Have another twelve books to pick up before my reading list is complete. I will eventually post up my pre-law personal reading list. I figure that reading up a bit before I start school won't hurt. The book list has been populated with suggestions from practicing and retired lawyers I have met with over the past six months.

Wednesday, December 22, 2004

More of the Same

Last evening I received a call from my father. I have my mail delivered to the parent's house in the suburbs because I will be moving out of this apartment before long.

Dad asked "How much does Chicago-Kent cost per year?"
I answered "Kent costs $27,450.00 per year for tuition."
Dad says "Well, it looks like you are going to be able to attend Kent for about $7,450 a year."
I responded "... Kent offered $20,000 scholarship, per year?"
Dad affirmed.
I went into a state of shock.

I thought DePaul's offer was generous. Kent has blown me away. I can attend law school at Kent for less than the cost of attending high school. For those of you following along at home this scholarship offer ends up being a $60,000 credit over three years. Wow!

On another note, I have started to put together a report aimed at helping the decision making process. I am assembling objective information about my top three choices Kent, DePaul and Loyola. I will publish the report on this journal when I have finished it which will likely happen sometime in mid to late January.

Monday, December 20, 2004

One More Bit of Good News

DePaul Law has extended me an offer of acceptance as well! This is shaping up to be one great holiday season. Additionally, DePaul Law has offered a staggering $12,000 tuition grant per year. That amounts to $36,000 over a three year period.

There is no way I could have expected this sort of opportunity six months ago when I first had an inclination to pick up a LSAT review guide. Things move so fast.

Saturday, December 18, 2004

Any News Is Good News

I got my first acceptance today. I can breathe easy now - the hard part is out of the way.

Chicago-Kent has extended me an offer of admission! I consider Kent one of my top three (realistic) choices. Why? Because Loyola, Kent and DePaul are the schools in Chicago I have applied to. I want to study and eventually practice in the city. Kent's reputation is starting to rise with each passing year very quickly and the school has several excellent certificate programs.

Let the games begin, a happy holiday season for certain.

Wednesday, December 15, 2004

No Real Suprises

I have returned home from China. No surprises on the law school front with admissions so far:

- Dinged from Georgetown
- Deferred at University of Minnesota

I was not expecting to hear anything good from either of these schools, along with University of Illinois and Notre Dame. I applied because there is a slim chance something may happen at each of them. Those slim chances are fun to think about but, like wishing to win the lottery, not likely to happen.

On the other hand if I start getting Deferred/Wait Listed at DePaul/Loyola/Kent I will start flipping out. No reason to think that will happen, but I could use some good news to help fuel my holiday season.

Friday, November 26, 2004

More on The Why

This is an addendum too the previous post The Why, thoughts on why I want to attend law school and my motivations for moving from technology to a new space:

Law school represents the best opportunity for me to reach the table. I have decided that I want to sit at the decision maker's table. It is where I want to be and it is my goal to get there as soon as possible.

When I was studying technology I was happy. Technology is a passion I have developed. I will be doing technology as a hobby years from now. This is the best way to keep technology in my life.

Working with technology I realized that it is not an effective way to get to the table. Technology is immature as a profession. Professionals in the IT space have been on the job for 20 years at most. CTOs get to sit at the table but the path to becoming a CTO is not one that interests me at this time.

Law as a profession is mature. The founding fathers of America were lawyers. Lawyers have had an important seat at the table for many centuries. As soon as I graduate from law school there will be opportunities for me to sit at the table immediately.

Additionally, the challenges of law and technology are very different in basic ways. Law demands a strong knowledge of theory and logical thinking. Technology demands a strong knowledge of practical knowledge and procedural tactics. My desires for professional practice are aligned with theory and logical thinking more than procedural knowledge.

I have updated a new style template to give this blog a breath of fresh air. There is also a poll in the side column to get some feedback from those who feel like giving some.

Wednesday, November 24, 2004

By The Numbers

I have been doing some more research lately based on my scores and the schools I have applied to. The data has been taken from the LSAC Official Guide to Law Schools. There are many different statistical reports and charts to consider, and this set of data is interesting if not incomplete as you will see below.

With winter break in full effect I have the time to compile statistics such as these. I have looked into the Applicant Grids for the schools I have applied to and recorded the results here. The numbers listed are the number of students which have applied and then been admitted with my score range at each school (if indicated):

Chicago Kent - 95/81
DePaul - 51/50
Georgetown - n/a
Hamline - 7/5
Illinois - n/a
John Marshal - [likely]
Loyola Chicago - 103/94
Minnesota - 169/51
Nortre Dame - n/a

The bold schools are my top choices. What do these numbers mean? It appears that most of the Tier 1 schools do not publish their Applicant Grids. The schools that do publish their grids give a good idea of how I will fare in the admissions process. Minnesota is a reach, but an attainable one according to the numbers. My top two choices, Kent and Loyola, both look extremely comfortable at this time.

I leave for China in a few days and will return in mid-December. I hope to know decisions from a my top choices by then. In the mean time I need to find a hobby to distract me from thinking about all of this!

Friday, November 12, 2004

The How

I have been using an online law school admissions tracking tool to help sort this chaos.

Follow along at home on LawSchoolNumbers.com.

I will be updating my profile information throughout the next few months.

Lets hope there are lots of "Accepts"!

Thursday, November 11, 2004

The Why

I want to attend law school because I am no longer interested in technology as a profession. Technology as a professional career is new. Professionals in this field have been around for 10-15 years at most. Because technology is so immature it is volatile. The growing pains of an immature job market are difficult to manage.

The experiences I have had working with technology on the job have not been satisfying. Satisfaction and fulfillment on the job are two requirements I have. Technology and work has not been able to produce an experience I am willing to sign the next 20 years of my life over to.

Law is a mature profession. Law as a career is not volatile. There is no law boom and then resulting waves of law out sourcing to Indiana, Russia and other third tier toilets. The stability law offers is extremely attractive. Additionally law offers a different challenge than technology.

Law allows me to get closer to the decision maker's table. I have a desire to lead and drive business. The roads that technology offers to the decision maker's table are not well trodden and appear to be extremely narrow. Law is a fast track to the table. I want to affect positive change and drive business.

Thursday, November 04, 2004

Its A Wrap

All of my applications have been submitted. I feel cool, calm and collected. The only thing I have to do now is wait and open up a few envelopes when they come back in and see how things turned out.

For the record, the official lists of schools I applied to are (in order of preference with reaches at the bottom because they are.. well, reaches):

  • Loyola University Chicago
  • DePaul Unviersity
  • Chicago-Kent
  • John Marshall
  • Hamline
  • [reach] University of Minnesota
  • [reach] University of Illinois
  • [reach] Notre Dame
Eight schools. I am applying with a 3.65/161 GPA/LSAT split. My numbers are excellent for my non-reaches. My hope is that some aspect of my resume and personal statement catch the eyes of the admission committees at the reach schools so I get a chance to hit a Top 25 "Tier 1" school.

No matter where I end up, I realize that law school is hard work. Even more than hard work, the rank of the school really doesn't matter much - your class rank does. As I prepare to enter school in about seven months I realize that I will have to work harder than I have had to before, but I feel I am ready.

And anyways, I get to go enjoy life in the mean time!

If you want to follow along with my admission season from home hit up this link: LawSchoolNumbers.